Hobbes Chen

Home

Work

Play

4:49:14 PM

Singapore

Hobbes Chen

Menu

Home

Work

Play

4:49:14 PM

Singapore

Project Type

Self-Initiated Concept Study

Tools

Figma

Core Pillars

Service Design

Information Architecture

Wayfinding and Commuting Experience

The Tropical Metro: Redesigning Singapore's Transit Experience

A self-initiated concept study reimagining Singapore's metro as a warm, inclusive and navigable city discovery — for the daily commuter and the first-time visitor alike. After all, Singapore's transit network is one of the best in the world. This study asks: can it also feel like Singapore?

This is an ongoing study — updated as the research deepens and the design evolves. What you see here reflects the current state of an active inquiry, not a finished proposal.

Foreword

This project began with a simple observation made during the quietest period Singapore had seen in decades.

During the COVID-19 reopening, with international borders closed and the world feeling smaller, I found myself rediscovering my own city on foot and by train. Armed with a mask and a renewed sense of curiosity, I spent those months riding to every corner of the island — studying the signage across different lines, watching how people navigated stations, and documenting the small moments of friction that most commuters had learned to silently absorb.

What I noticed wasn't a broken system. Singapore's transit network is, by any global standard, remarkable. What I noticed was a gap — between the world-class infrastructure we had built, and the human experience of moving through it. The map felt dense and clinical. The wayfinding felt inconsistent. And the overall visual language, while functional, felt like it belonged to a different city — not the warm, green, tropical one just outside the station doors.

And this is how this little project of mine was born.

The Tropical Metro is a concept study exploring what Singapore's transit experience could feel like if it were designed not just for efficiency, but for belonging — for the elderly commuter who could not read English, the tourist navigating their first interchange, and the local who has quietly learned to tolerate friction they shouldn't have to.

This project began with a simple observation made during the quietest period Singapore had seen in decades.

During the COVID-19 reopening, with international borders closed and the world feeling smaller, I found myself rediscovering my own city on foot and by train. Armed with a mask and a renewed sense of curiosity, I spent those months riding to every corner of the island — studying the signage across different lines, watching how people navigated stations, and documenting the small moments of friction that most commuters had learned to silently absorb.

What I noticed wasn't a broken system. Singapore's transit network is, by any global standard, remarkable. What I noticed was a gap — between the world-class infrastructure we had built, and the human experience of moving through it. The map felt dense and clinical. The wayfinding felt inconsistent. And the overall visual language, while functional, felt like it belonged to a different city — not the warm, green, tropical one just outside the station doors.

And this is how this little project of mine was born.

The Tropical Metro is a concept study exploring what Singapore's transit experience could feel like if it were designed not just for efficiency, but for belonging — for the elderly commuter who could not read English, the tourist navigating their first interchange, and the local who has quietly learned to tolerate friction they shouldn't have to.

This project began with a simple observation made during the quietest period Singapore had seen in decades.

During the COVID-19 reopening, with international borders closed and the world feeling smaller, I found myself rediscovering my own city on foot and by train. Armed with a mask and a renewed sense of curiosity, I spent those months riding to every corner of the island — studying the signage across different lines, watching how people navigated stations, and documenting the small moments of friction that most commuters had learned to silently absorb.

What I noticed wasn't a broken system. Singapore's transit network is, by any global standard, remarkable. What I noticed was a gap — between the world-class infrastructure we had built, and the human experience of moving through it. The map felt dense and clinical. The wayfinding felt inconsistent. And the overall visual language, while functional, felt like it belonged to a different city — not the warm, green, tropical one just outside the station doors.

And this is how this little project of mine was born.

The Tropical Metro is a concept study exploring what Singapore's transit experience could feel like if it were designed not just for efficiency, but for belonging — for the elderly commuter who could not read English, the tourist navigating their first interchange, and the local who has quietly learned to tolerate friction they shouldn't have to.

Context

Singapore's MRT network is one of the most expansive and reliable in the world. But expansion brings complexity. As new lines open and interchange stations multiply, the traditional system map is being pushed toward the edges of cognitive manageability — more lines, more colours, more station codes, more information competing for attention on a single diagram.

This project addresses that challenge through two lenses: the macro experience of reading and understanding the system map, and the micro experience of navigating through a physical station. Both matter. And right now, they don't always speak the same language.

This project seeks to address identified gaps by redesigning the transit map and wayfinding experience to be more:

[1] Intuitive, by reducing cognitive load at decision points
[2] Inclusive, by serving the full diversity of Singapore's ridership
[3] Grounded in identity, by reflecting Singapore's warm, tropical, 'City in Nature' character.

Problem
Discovery

Over multiple field visits and my daily commute experience across stations spanning every line — from Woodlands North to Tanah Merah, from Bishan to Maxwell — I conducted an environmental audit, photographing and cataloguing friction points in the wayfinding system. What emerged were five distinct, recurring patterns.

  • The "Guerilla Signage" Red Flag: During station visits, I observed "guerrilla signage" — handwritten or laminated A4 sheets taped to walls by staff. This is a clear indicator that the official wayfinding system has failed to provide critical information at high-stress decision points, resulting in these makeshift workarounds.

  • Accessibility and Inclusivity Barriers: My audit identified that existing system map headers often lack multi-language representation, failing to address the diverse user personas (e.g. non-English speaking silver generation or international tourists) that make up Singapore’s daily ridership.

  • Orientation Gap and Complexity of Spatial Mental Mapping: The current visual language relies heavily on sterile, industrial tones (greys and harsh whites). While functional, this aesthetic lacks the "warmth" of Singapore’s identity, making the commute feel like a clinical process rather than an inviting journey through a "City in Nature".

    This is confirmed by a scan of online discourse (e.g. Reddit) where commuters — myself including — struggle with spatial mental mapping, where three-dimensional floor plans of interchanges are displayed on the

  • The "Guerilla Signage" Red Flag: During station visits, I observed "guerrilla signage" — handwritten or laminated A4 sheets taped to walls by staff. This is a clear indicator that the official wayfinding system has failed to provide critical information at high-stress decision points, resulting in these makeshift workarounds.

  • Accessibility and Inclusivity Barriers: My audit identified that existing system map headers often lack multi-language representation, failing to address the diverse user personas (e.g. non-English speaking silver generation or international tourists) that make up Singapore’s daily ridership.

  • Orientation Gap and Complexity of Spatial Mental Mapping: The current visual language relies heavily on sterile, industrial tones (greys and harsh whites). While functional, this aesthetic lacks the "warmth" of Singapore’s identity, making the commute feel like a clinical process rather than an inviting journey through a "City in Nature".

    This is confirmed by a scan of online discourse (e.g. Reddit) where commuters — myself including — struggle with spatial mental mapping, where three-dimensional floor plans of interchanges are displayed on the

Finding 1 — Guerrilla Signage: The System Admitting It Has Failed

The most telling signal of a wayfinding breakdown isn't what designers put up. It's what station staff tape to the walls when the official system isn't enough.

At multiple stations, I documented laminated A4 sheets and improvised notices — produced by ground staff to fill gaps in the official signage at high-stress decision points. In UX terms, guerrilla signage is the equivalent of a tooltip that exists because the interface wasn't clear enough. Except here, the stakes are a missed train or a confused elderly commuter standing alone at a junction.

  • The "Guerilla Signage" Red Flag: During station visits, I observed "guerrilla signage" — handwritten or laminated A4 sheets taped to walls by staff. This is a clear indicator that the official wayfinding system has failed to provide critical information at high-stress decision points, resulting in these makeshift workarounds.

  • Accessibility and Inclusivity Barriers: My audit identified that existing system map headers often lack multi-language representation, failing to address the diverse user personas (e.g. non-English speaking silver generation or international tourists) that make up Singapore’s daily ridership.

  • Orientation Gap and Complexity of Spatial Mental Mapping: The current visual language relies heavily on sterile, industrial tones (greys and harsh whites). While functional, this aesthetic lacks the "warmth" of Singapore’s identity, making the commute feel like a clinical process rather than an inviting journey through a "City in Nature".

    This is confirmed by a scan of online discourse (e.g. Reddit) where commuters — myself including — struggle with spatial mental mapping, where three-dimensional floor plans of interchanges are displayed on the

  • The "Guerilla Signage" Red Flag: During station visits, I observed "guerrilla signage" — handwritten or laminated A4 sheets taped to walls by staff. This is a clear indicator that the official wayfinding system has failed to provide critical information at high-stress decision points, resulting in these makeshift workarounds.

  • Accessibility and Inclusivity Barriers: My audit identified that existing system map headers often lack multi-language representation, failing to address the diverse user personas (e.g. non-English speaking silver generation or international tourists) that make up Singapore’s daily ridership.

  • Orientation Gap and Complexity of Spatial Mental Mapping: The current visual language relies heavily on sterile, industrial tones (greys and harsh whites). While functional, this aesthetic lacks the "warmth" of Singapore’s identity, making the commute feel like a clinical process rather than an inviting journey through a "City in Nature".

    This is confirmed by a scan of online discourse (e.g. Reddit) where commuters — myself including — struggle with spatial mental mapping, where three-dimensional floor plans of interchanges are displayed on the

Improvised walking maps distributed at station entrances — produced by ground staff to fill gaps the official wayfinding system left behind. A clear signal that the designed system failed to provide critical information at the moment it was needed.

  • The "Guerilla Signage" Red Flag: During station visits, I observed "guerrilla signage" — handwritten or laminated A4 sheets taped to walls by staff. This is a clear indicator that the official wayfinding system has failed to provide critical information at high-stress decision points, resulting in these makeshift workarounds.

  • Accessibility and Inclusivity Barriers: My audit identified that existing system map headers often lack multi-language representation, failing to address the diverse user personas (e.g. non-English speaking silver generation or international tourists) that make up Singapore’s daily ridership.

  • Orientation Gap and Complexity of Spatial Mental Mapping: The current visual language relies heavily on sterile, industrial tones (greys and harsh whites). While functional, this aesthetic lacks the "warmth" of Singapore’s identity, making the commute feel like a clinical process rather than an inviting journey through a "City in Nature".

    This is confirmed by a scan of online discourse (e.g. Reddit) where commuters — myself including — struggle with spatial mental mapping, where three-dimensional floor plans of interchanges are displayed on the

  • The "Guerilla Signage" Red Flag: During station visits, I observed "guerrilla signage" — handwritten or laminated A4 sheets taped to walls by staff. This is a clear indicator that the official wayfinding system has failed to provide critical information at high-stress decision points, resulting in these makeshift workarounds.

  • Accessibility and Inclusivity Barriers: My audit identified that existing system map headers often lack multi-language representation, failing to address the diverse user personas (e.g. non-English speaking silver generation or international tourists) that make up Singapore’s daily ridership.

  • Orientation Gap and Complexity of Spatial Mental Mapping: The current visual language relies heavily on sterile, industrial tones (greys and harsh whites). While functional, this aesthetic lacks the "warmth" of Singapore’s identity, making the commute feel like a clinical process rather than an inviting journey through a "City in Nature".

    This is confirmed by a scan of online discourse (e.g. Reddit) where commuters — myself including — struggle with spatial mental mapping, where three-dimensional floor plans of interchanges are displayed on the

Handwritten and printed service adjustment notices taped at station entrances — another example of staff-initiated workarounds filling official communication gaps during disruptions.

  • The "Guerilla Signage" Red Flag: During station visits, I observed "guerrilla signage" — handwritten or laminated A4 sheets taped to walls by staff. This is a clear indicator that the official wayfinding system has failed to provide critical information at high-stress decision points, resulting in these makeshift workarounds.

  • Accessibility and Inclusivity Barriers: My audit identified that existing system map headers often lack multi-language representation, failing to address the diverse user personas (e.g. non-English speaking silver generation or international tourists) that make up Singapore’s daily ridership.

  • Orientation Gap and Complexity of Spatial Mental Mapping: The current visual language relies heavily on sterile, industrial tones (greys and harsh whites). While functional, this aesthetic lacks the "warmth" of Singapore’s identity, making the commute feel like a clinical process rather than an inviting journey through a "City in Nature".

    This is confirmed by a scan of online discourse (e.g. Reddit) where commuters — myself including — struggle with spatial mental mapping, where three-dimensional floor plans of interchanges are displayed on the

  • The "Guerilla Signage" Red Flag: During station visits, I observed "guerrilla signage" — handwritten or laminated A4 sheets taped to walls by staff. This is a clear indicator that the official wayfinding system has failed to provide critical information at high-stress decision points, resulting in these makeshift workarounds.

  • Accessibility and Inclusivity Barriers: My audit identified that existing system map headers often lack multi-language representation, failing to address the diverse user personas (e.g. non-English speaking silver generation or international tourists) that make up Singapore’s daily ridership.

  • Orientation Gap and Complexity of Spatial Mental Mapping: The current visual language relies heavily on sterile, industrial tones (greys and harsh whites). While functional, this aesthetic lacks the "warmth" of Singapore’s identity, making the commute feel like a clinical process rather than an inviting journey through a "City in Nature".

    This is confirmed by a scan of online discourse (e.g. Reddit) where commuters — myself including — struggle with spatial mental mapping, where three-dimensional floor plans of interchanges are displayed on the

Finding 2 — Information Overload at Decision Points

Exit directory panels at major stations are dense, text-heavy, and require sustained reading at precisely the moment when commuters are moving, tired, or disoriented. The current design prioritises comprehensiveness over scannability — listing every destination alphabetically rather than organising by proximity, relevance, or exit number.

A commuter looking for Ion Orchard shouldn't need to read a directory. They should be able to glance, decide, and move.

  • The "Guerilla Signage" Red Flag: During station visits, I observed "guerrilla signage" — handwritten or laminated A4 sheets taped to walls by staff. This is a clear indicator that the official wayfinding system has failed to provide critical information at high-stress decision points, resulting in these makeshift workarounds.

  • Accessibility and Inclusivity Barriers: My audit identified that existing system map headers often lack multi-language representation, failing to address the diverse user personas (e.g. non-English speaking silver generation or international tourists) that make up Singapore’s daily ridership.

  • Orientation Gap and Complexity of Spatial Mental Mapping: The current visual language relies heavily on sterile, industrial tones (greys and harsh whites). While functional, this aesthetic lacks the "warmth" of Singapore’s identity, making the commute feel like a clinical process rather than an inviting journey through a "City in Nature".

    This is confirmed by a scan of online discourse (e.g. Reddit) where commuters — myself including — struggle with spatial mental mapping, where three-dimensional floor plans of interchanges are displayed on the

  • The "Guerilla Signage" Red Flag: During station visits, I observed "guerrilla signage" — handwritten or laminated A4 sheets taped to walls by staff. This is a clear indicator that the official wayfinding system has failed to provide critical information at high-stress decision points, resulting in these makeshift workarounds.

  • Accessibility and Inclusivity Barriers: My audit identified that existing system map headers often lack multi-language representation, failing to address the diverse user personas (e.g. non-English speaking silver generation or international tourists) that make up Singapore’s daily ridership.

  • Orientation Gap and Complexity of Spatial Mental Mapping: The current visual language relies heavily on sterile, industrial tones (greys and harsh whites). While functional, this aesthetic lacks the "warmth" of Singapore’s identity, making the commute feel like a clinical process rather than an inviting journey through a "City in Nature".

    This is confirmed by a scan of online discourse (e.g. Reddit) where commuters — myself including — struggle with spatial mental mapping, where three-dimensional floor plans of interchanges are displayed on the

Dense exit directory panels listing all destinations alphabetically — comprehensive but slow to scan when moving. The cognitive load required to find a specific destination is disproportionate to the urgency of the decision.

  • The "Guerilla Signage" Red Flag: During station visits, I observed "guerrilla signage" — handwritten or laminated A4 sheets taped to walls by staff. This is a clear indicator that the official wayfinding system has failed to provide critical information at high-stress decision points, resulting in these makeshift workarounds.

  • Accessibility and Inclusivity Barriers: My audit identified that existing system map headers often lack multi-language representation, failing to address the diverse user personas (e.g. non-English speaking silver generation or international tourists) that make up Singapore’s daily ridership.

  • Orientation Gap and Complexity of Spatial Mental Mapping: The current visual language relies heavily on sterile, industrial tones (greys and harsh whites). While functional, this aesthetic lacks the "warmth" of Singapore’s identity, making the commute feel like a clinical process rather than an inviting journey through a "City in Nature".

    This is confirmed by a scan of online discourse (e.g. Reddit) where commuters — myself including — struggle with spatial mental mapping, where three-dimensional floor plans of interchanges are displayed on the

  • The "Guerilla Signage" Red Flag: During station visits, I observed "guerrilla signage" — handwritten or laminated A4 sheets taped to walls by staff. This is a clear indicator that the official wayfinding system has failed to provide critical information at high-stress decision points, resulting in these makeshift workarounds.

  • Accessibility and Inclusivity Barriers: My audit identified that existing system map headers often lack multi-language representation, failing to address the diverse user personas (e.g. non-English speaking silver generation or international tourists) that make up Singapore’s daily ridership.

  • Orientation Gap and Complexity of Spatial Mental Mapping: The current visual language relies heavily on sterile, industrial tones (greys and harsh whites). While functional, this aesthetic lacks the "warmth" of Singapore’s identity, making the commute feel like a clinical process rather than an inviting journey through a "City in Nature".

    This is confirmed by a scan of online discourse (e.g. Reddit) where commuters — myself including — struggle with spatial mental mapping, where three-dimensional floor plans of interchanges are displayed on the

The full system map as displayed on in-station screens — a dense information environment that demands sustained attention to parse. As the network expands, this challenge will only grow.

  • The "Guerilla Signage" Red Flag: During station visits, I observed "guerrilla signage" — handwritten or laminated A4 sheets taped to walls by staff. This is a clear indicator that the official wayfinding system has failed to provide critical information at high-stress decision points, resulting in these makeshift workarounds.

  • Accessibility and Inclusivity Barriers: My audit identified that existing system map headers often lack multi-language representation, failing to address the diverse user personas (e.g. non-English speaking silver generation or international tourists) that make up Singapore’s daily ridership.

  • Orientation Gap and Complexity of Spatial Mental Mapping: The current visual language relies heavily on sterile, industrial tones (greys and harsh whites). While functional, this aesthetic lacks the "warmth" of Singapore’s identity, making the commute feel like a clinical process rather than an inviting journey through a "City in Nature".

    This is confirmed by a scan of online discourse (e.g. Reddit) where commuters — myself including — struggle with spatial mental mapping, where three-dimensional floor plans of interchanges are displayed on the

  • The "Guerilla Signage" Red Flag: During station visits, I observed "guerrilla signage" — handwritten or laminated A4 sheets taped to walls by staff. This is a clear indicator that the official wayfinding system has failed to provide critical information at high-stress decision points, resulting in these makeshift workarounds.

  • Accessibility and Inclusivity Barriers: My audit identified that existing system map headers often lack multi-language representation, failing to address the diverse user personas (e.g. non-English speaking silver generation or international tourists) that make up Singapore’s daily ridership.

  • Orientation Gap and Complexity of Spatial Mental Mapping: The current visual language relies heavily on sterile, industrial tones (greys and harsh whites). While functional, this aesthetic lacks the "warmth" of Singapore’s identity, making the commute feel like a clinical process rather than an inviting journey through a "City in Nature".

    This is confirmed by a scan of online discourse (e.g. Reddit) where commuters — myself including — struggle with spatial mental mapping, where three-dimensional floor plans of interchanges are displayed on the

Finding 3 — The Orientation Gap: Where Am I, and Which Way is Out?

At several stations, particularly newer ones on the TEL, exiting the train offers little immediate directional context. There are no landmark anchors, no 'you are here' orientation cues at platform level. Commuters default to following the crowd or guessing — which causes hesitation, congestion at pinch points, and the quiet anxiety of not knowing if you're heading the right way.

This is an orientation problem, not a signage problem. The information exists somewhere in the station. It just isn't where the decision happens.

  • The "Guerilla Signage" Red Flag: During station visits, I observed "guerrilla signage" — handwritten or laminated A4 sheets taped to walls by staff. This is a clear indicator that the official wayfinding system has failed to provide critical information at high-stress decision points, resulting in these makeshift workarounds.

  • Accessibility and Inclusivity Barriers: My audit identified that existing system map headers often lack multi-language representation, failing to address the diverse user personas (e.g. non-English speaking silver generation or international tourists) that make up Singapore’s daily ridership.

  • Orientation Gap and Complexity of Spatial Mental Mapping: The current visual language relies heavily on sterile, industrial tones (greys and harsh whites). While functional, this aesthetic lacks the "warmth" of Singapore’s identity, making the commute feel like a clinical process rather than an inviting journey through a "City in Nature".

    This is confirmed by a scan of online discourse (e.g. Reddit) where commuters — myself including — struggle with spatial mental mapping, where three-dimensional floor plans of interchanges are displayed on the

  • The "Guerilla Signage" Red Flag: During station visits, I observed "guerrilla signage" — handwritten or laminated A4 sheets taped to walls by staff. This is a clear indicator that the official wayfinding system has failed to provide critical information at high-stress decision points, resulting in these makeshift workarounds.

  • Accessibility and Inclusivity Barriers: My audit identified that existing system map headers often lack multi-language representation, failing to address the diverse user personas (e.g. non-English speaking silver generation or international tourists) that make up Singapore’s daily ridership.

  • Orientation Gap and Complexity of Spatial Mental Mapping: The current visual language relies heavily on sterile, industrial tones (greys and harsh whites). While functional, this aesthetic lacks the "warmth" of Singapore’s identity, making the commute feel like a clinical process rather than an inviting journey through a "City in Nature".

    This is confirmed by a scan of online discourse (e.g. Reddit) where commuters — myself including — struggle with spatial mental mapping, where three-dimensional floor plans of interchanges are displayed on the

A clean, well-designed newer station — but upon exiting the train, immediate directional context is limited. No landmark anchors or orientation cues at platform level to guide the first decision a commuter makes.

  • The "Guerilla Signage" Red Flag: During station visits, I observed "guerrilla signage" — handwritten or laminated A4 sheets taped to walls by staff. This is a clear indicator that the official wayfinding system has failed to provide critical information at high-stress decision points, resulting in these makeshift workarounds.

  • Accessibility and Inclusivity Barriers: My audit identified that existing system map headers often lack multi-language representation, failing to address the diverse user personas (e.g. non-English speaking silver generation or international tourists) that make up Singapore’s daily ridership.

  • Orientation Gap and Complexity of Spatial Mental Mapping: The current visual language relies heavily on sterile, industrial tones (greys and harsh whites). While functional, this aesthetic lacks the "warmth" of Singapore’s identity, making the commute feel like a clinical process rather than an inviting journey through a "City in Nature".

    This is confirmed by a scan of online discourse (e.g. Reddit) where commuters — myself including — struggle with spatial mental mapping, where three-dimensional floor plans of interchanges are displayed on the

  • The "Guerilla Signage" Red Flag: During station visits, I observed "guerrilla signage" — handwritten or laminated A4 sheets taped to walls by staff. This is a clear indicator that the official wayfinding system has failed to provide critical information at high-stress decision points, resulting in these makeshift workarounds.

  • Accessibility and Inclusivity Barriers: My audit identified that existing system map headers often lack multi-language representation, failing to address the diverse user personas (e.g. non-English speaking silver generation or international tourists) that make up Singapore’s daily ridership.

  • Orientation Gap and Complexity of Spatial Mental Mapping: The current visual language relies heavily on sterile, industrial tones (greys and harsh whites). While functional, this aesthetic lacks the "warmth" of Singapore’s identity, making the commute feel like a clinical process rather than an inviting journey through a "City in Nature".

    This is confirmed by a scan of online discourse (e.g. Reddit) where commuters — myself including — struggle with spatial mental mapping, where three-dimensional floor plans of interchanges are displayed on the

The older North-South Line stations present a different orientation challenge: multiple overlapping signage systems accumulated over decades, creating visual noise rather than clear hierarchy.

  • The "Guerilla Signage" Red Flag: During station visits, I observed "guerrilla signage" — handwritten or laminated A4 sheets taped to walls by staff. This is a clear indicator that the official wayfinding system has failed to provide critical information at high-stress decision points, resulting in these makeshift workarounds.

  • Accessibility and Inclusivity Barriers: My audit identified that existing system map headers often lack multi-language representation, failing to address the diverse user personas (e.g. non-English speaking silver generation or international tourists) that make up Singapore’s daily ridership.

  • Orientation Gap and Complexity of Spatial Mental Mapping: The current visual language relies heavily on sterile, industrial tones (greys and harsh whites). While functional, this aesthetic lacks the "warmth" of Singapore’s identity, making the commute feel like a clinical process rather than an inviting journey through a "City in Nature".

    This is confirmed by a scan of online discourse (e.g. Reddit) where commuters — myself including — struggle with spatial mental mapping, where three-dimensional floor plans of interchanges are displayed on the

  • The "Guerilla Signage" Red Flag: During station visits, I observed "guerrilla signage" — handwritten or laminated A4 sheets taped to walls by staff. This is a clear indicator that the official wayfinding system has failed to provide critical information at high-stress decision points, resulting in these makeshift workarounds.

  • Accessibility and Inclusivity Barriers: My audit identified that existing system map headers often lack multi-language representation, failing to address the diverse user personas (e.g. non-English speaking silver generation or international tourists) that make up Singapore’s daily ridership.

  • Orientation Gap and Complexity of Spatial Mental Mapping: The current visual language relies heavily on sterile, industrial tones (greys and harsh whites). While functional, this aesthetic lacks the "warmth" of Singapore’s identity, making the commute feel like a clinical process rather than an inviting journey through a "City in Nature".

    This is confirmed by a scan of online discourse (e.g. Reddit) where commuters — myself including — struggle with spatial mental mapping, where three-dimensional floor plans of interchanges are displayed on the

Finding 4 — Accessibility and Language Exclusion

Singapore's ridership is multilingual by reality if not always by design. A significant portion of elderly commuters read primarily in Mandarin, Malay, or Tamil. The current system map and much of the in-station signage defaults to English, with limited multilingual support.

Station staff fill this gap during peak hours — but a well-designed system shouldn't require human intervention to be navigable by a significant portion of its regular users.

  • The "Guerilla Signage" Red Flag: During station visits, I observed "guerrilla signage" — handwritten or laminated A4 sheets taped to walls by staff. This is a clear indicator that the official wayfinding system has failed to provide critical information at high-stress decision points, resulting in these makeshift workarounds.

  • Accessibility and Inclusivity Barriers: My audit identified that existing system map headers often lack multi-language representation, failing to address the diverse user personas (e.g. non-English speaking silver generation or international tourists) that make up Singapore’s daily ridership.

  • Orientation Gap and Complexity of Spatial Mental Mapping: The current visual language relies heavily on sterile, industrial tones (greys and harsh whites). While functional, this aesthetic lacks the "warmth" of Singapore’s identity, making the commute feel like a clinical process rather than an inviting journey through a "City in Nature".

    This is confirmed by a scan of online discourse (e.g. Reddit) where commuters — myself including — struggle with spatial mental mapping, where three-dimensional floor plans of interchanges are displayed on the

  • The "Guerilla Signage" Red Flag: During station visits, I observed "guerrilla signage" — handwritten or laminated A4 sheets taped to walls by staff. This is a clear indicator that the official wayfinding system has failed to provide critical information at high-stress decision points, resulting in these makeshift workarounds.

  • Accessibility and Inclusivity Barriers: My audit identified that existing system map headers often lack multi-language representation, failing to address the diverse user personas (e.g. non-English speaking silver generation or international tourists) that make up Singapore’s daily ridership.

  • Orientation Gap and Complexity of Spatial Mental Mapping: The current visual language relies heavily on sterile, industrial tones (greys and harsh whites). While functional, this aesthetic lacks the "warmth" of Singapore’s identity, making the commute feel like a clinical process rather than an inviting journey through a "City in Nature".

    This is confirmed by a scan of online discourse (e.g. Reddit) where commuters — myself including — struggle with spatial mental mapping, where three-dimensional floor plans of interchanges are displayed on the

Exit signage with destination lists in small English-only type — legibility is challenging even in a photograph, let alone for an elderly commuter in motion. Multilingual support is absent at this touchpoint.

  • The "Guerilla Signage" Red Flag: During station visits, I observed "guerrilla signage" — handwritten or laminated A4 sheets taped to walls by staff. This is a clear indicator that the official wayfinding system has failed to provide critical information at high-stress decision points, resulting in these makeshift workarounds.

  • Accessibility and Inclusivity Barriers: My audit identified that existing system map headers often lack multi-language representation, failing to address the diverse user personas (e.g. non-English speaking silver generation or international tourists) that make up Singapore’s daily ridership.

  • Orientation Gap and Complexity of Spatial Mental Mapping: The current visual language relies heavily on sterile, industrial tones (greys and harsh whites). While functional, this aesthetic lacks the "warmth" of Singapore’s identity, making the commute feel like a clinical process rather than an inviting journey through a "City in Nature".

    This is confirmed by a scan of online discourse (e.g. Reddit) where commuters — myself including — struggle with spatial mental mapping, where three-dimensional floor plans of interchanges are displayed on the

  • The "Guerilla Signage" Red Flag: During station visits, I observed "guerrilla signage" — handwritten or laminated A4 sheets taped to walls by staff. This is a clear indicator that the official wayfinding system has failed to provide critical information at high-stress decision points, resulting in these makeshift workarounds.

  • Accessibility and Inclusivity Barriers: My audit identified that existing system map headers often lack multi-language representation, failing to address the diverse user personas (e.g. non-English speaking silver generation or international tourists) that make up Singapore’s daily ridership.

  • Orientation Gap and Complexity of Spatial Mental Mapping: The current visual language relies heavily on sterile, industrial tones (greys and harsh whites). While functional, this aesthetic lacks the "warmth" of Singapore’s identity, making the commute feel like a clinical process rather than an inviting journey through a "City in Nature".

    This is confirmed by a scan of online discourse (e.g. Reddit) where commuters — myself including — struggle with spatial mental mapping, where three-dimensional floor plans of interchanges are displayed on the

Finding 5 — Operator Inconsistency: Three Networks, No Shared Language

Travelling across lines managed by different operators reveals a fragmented visual experience. The Thomson-East Coast Line, Downtown Line, and North-South Line each carry distinct visual languages — different colour temperatures, different signage typographies, different exit numbering conventions.

For a daily commuter who has learned one line, crossing into another requires relearning the visual grammar from scratch. For a tourist or first-time visitor, there is no grammar to learn from at all.

  • The "Guerilla Signage" Red Flag: During station visits, I observed "guerrilla signage" — handwritten or laminated A4 sheets taped to walls by staff. This is a clear indicator that the official wayfinding system has failed to provide critical information at high-stress decision points, resulting in these makeshift workarounds.

  • Accessibility and Inclusivity Barriers: My audit identified that existing system map headers often lack multi-language representation, failing to address the diverse user personas (e.g. non-English speaking silver generation or international tourists) that make up Singapore’s daily ridership.

  • Orientation Gap and Complexity of Spatial Mental Mapping: The current visual language relies heavily on sterile, industrial tones (greys and harsh whites). While functional, this aesthetic lacks the "warmth" of Singapore’s identity, making the commute feel like a clinical process rather than an inviting journey through a "City in Nature".

    This is confirmed by a scan of online discourse (e.g. Reddit) where commuters — myself including — struggle with spatial mental mapping, where three-dimensional floor plans of interchanges are displayed on the

  • The "Guerilla Signage" Red Flag: During station visits, I observed "guerrilla signage" — handwritten or laminated A4 sheets taped to walls by staff. This is a clear indicator that the official wayfinding system has failed to provide critical information at high-stress decision points, resulting in these makeshift workarounds.

  • Accessibility and Inclusivity Barriers: My audit identified that existing system map headers often lack multi-language representation, failing to address the diverse user personas (e.g. non-English speaking silver generation or international tourists) that make up Singapore’s daily ridership.

  • Orientation Gap and Complexity of Spatial Mental Mapping: The current visual language relies heavily on sterile, industrial tones (greys and harsh whites). While functional, this aesthetic lacks the "warmth" of Singapore’s identity, making the commute feel like a clinical process rather than an inviting journey through a "City in Nature".

    This is confirmed by a scan of online discourse (e.g. Reddit) where commuters — myself including — struggle with spatial mental mapping, where three-dimensional floor plans of interchanges are displayed on the

The North-South Line's older visual language: warm orange accent, older typographic conventions. A distinct aesthetic from newer lines.

  • The "Guerilla Signage" Red Flag: During station visits, I observed "guerrilla signage" — handwritten or laminated A4 sheets taped to walls by staff. This is a clear indicator that the official wayfinding system has failed to provide critical information at high-stress decision points, resulting in these makeshift workarounds.

  • Accessibility and Inclusivity Barriers: My audit identified that existing system map headers often lack multi-language representation, failing to address the diverse user personas (e.g. non-English speaking silver generation or international tourists) that make up Singapore’s daily ridership.

  • Orientation Gap and Complexity of Spatial Mental Mapping: The current visual language relies heavily on sterile, industrial tones (greys and harsh whites). While functional, this aesthetic lacks the "warmth" of Singapore’s identity, making the commute feel like a clinical process rather than an inviting journey through a "City in Nature".

    This is confirmed by a scan of online discourse (e.g. Reddit) where commuters — myself including — struggle with spatial mental mapping, where three-dimensional floor plans of interchanges are displayed on the

  • The "Guerilla Signage" Red Flag: During station visits, I observed "guerrilla signage" — handwritten or laminated A4 sheets taped to walls by staff. This is a clear indicator that the official wayfinding system has failed to provide critical information at high-stress decision points, resulting in these makeshift workarounds.

  • Accessibility and Inclusivity Barriers: My audit identified that existing system map headers often lack multi-language representation, failing to address the diverse user personas (e.g. non-English speaking silver generation or international tourists) that make up Singapore’s daily ridership.

  • Orientation Gap and Complexity of Spatial Mental Mapping: The current visual language relies heavily on sterile, industrial tones (greys and harsh whites). While functional, this aesthetic lacks the "warmth" of Singapore’s identity, making the commute feel like a clinical process rather than an inviting journey through a "City in Nature".

    This is confirmed by a scan of online discourse (e.g. Reddit) where commuters — myself including — struggle with spatial mental mapping, where three-dimensional floor plans of interchanges are displayed on the

The Thomson-East Coast Line's newer visual language: darker palette, contemporary finish, different exit numbering convention. Same network, different system.

  • The "Guerilla Signage" Red Flag: During station visits, I observed "guerrilla signage" — handwritten or laminated A4 sheets taped to walls by staff. This is a clear indicator that the official wayfinding system has failed to provide critical information at high-stress decision points, resulting in these makeshift workarounds.

  • Accessibility and Inclusivity Barriers: My audit identified that existing system map headers often lack multi-language representation, failing to address the diverse user personas (e.g. non-English speaking silver generation or international tourists) that make up Singapore’s daily ridership.

  • Orientation Gap and Complexity of Spatial Mental Mapping: The current visual language relies heavily on sterile, industrial tones (greys and harsh whites). While functional, this aesthetic lacks the "warmth" of Singapore’s identity, making the commute feel like a clinical process rather than an inviting journey through a "City in Nature".

    This is confirmed by a scan of online discourse (e.g. Reddit) where commuters — myself including — struggle with spatial mental mapping, where three-dimensional floor plans of interchanges are displayed on the

  • The "Guerilla Signage" Red Flag: During station visits, I observed "guerrilla signage" — handwritten or laminated A4 sheets taped to walls by staff. This is a clear indicator that the official wayfinding system has failed to provide critical information at high-stress decision points, resulting in these makeshift workarounds.

  • Accessibility and Inclusivity Barriers: My audit identified that existing system map headers often lack multi-language representation, failing to address the diverse user personas (e.g. non-English speaking silver generation or international tourists) that make up Singapore’s daily ridership.

  • Orientation Gap and Complexity of Spatial Mental Mapping: The current visual language relies heavily on sterile, industrial tones (greys and harsh whites). While functional, this aesthetic lacks the "warmth" of Singapore’s identity, making the commute feel like a clinical process rather than an inviting journey through a "City in Nature".

    This is confirmed by a scan of online discourse (e.g. Reddit) where commuters — myself including — struggle with spatial mental mapping, where three-dimensional floor plans of interchanges are displayed on the

Methodology & Strategic Approach

  • Environmental Audit

    Field visits across multiple MRT lines and interchange stations, documenting signage inconsistencies, wayfinding failures, and commuter behaviour at decision points. Stations visited span all major operators and line generations — from legacy NSL stations to new TEL openings.

  • Heuristic Evaluation

    The existing system map was evaluated against established wayfinding and information design principles — scannability, visual hierarchy, cognitive load, and accessibility standards. Station signage was assessed for consistency, legibility, and orientation support.

  • Community Validation

    The redesigned map was shared with a community of daily commuters on social media to gather real-world feedback on usability, intuitiveness, and scannability — grounding the design proposals in lived commuter experience rather than designer assumptions.

Design Proposals & Rationale

The following proposals represent the current state of this living study. Some are resolved. Others are deliberately left open — documented here as design tensions worth naming honestly.

01
Multilingual Interface: Designing for the Whole Ridership

A language switcher is proposed at the top left of the map panel — allowing commuters to switch between English, Mandarin, Malay, and Tamil. This is designed as a touchscreen interaction, acknowledging that many newer station display panels support touch input.

02
The System Map: Legibility Over Density

The redesigned map introduces horizontal station name labels and a stricter grid — a direct response to the cognitive strain of reading diagonal text in a dense information environment. Following Fitts's Law principles, horizontal text reduces the scanning effort required to identify stations, particularly in high-density interchange areas.

A deliberate tradeoff was made: station codes were removed from within the station markers to reduce visual clutter and improve legibility at a glance. This introduced a new tension — some commuters rely on station codes for navigation, particularly when cross-referencing with in-train displays. This tension is unresolved and remains an open design question in this study.

The colour palette was also revisited. The current map's line colours, while distinctive, carry a harshness that contributes to visual fatigue — particularly problematic for elderly users and those with colour sensitivity. The proposed palette retains line differentiation while shifting toward warmer, less saturated tones that reduce strain without sacrificing clarity.

A screenshot showing a heated exchange in the comment thread section with AI moderation,
03
Otto and the Tropical Metro Identity

At the heart of this redesign is a question that goes beyond information design: what should it feel like to move through Singapore?

The current visual language is functional but sterile — greys, harsh whites, industrial finishes. It does not reflect the city outside the station doors. Singapore is green, warm, and alive. Its transit system could be too.

Otto — a Singapore otter, rendered as a friendly station companion — is proposed as the mascot of the Tropical Metro identity. The choice is deliberate. Singapore's wild otter families have become a genuine cultural touchpoint, appearing in viral news, social media, and local affection. Otto is not arbitrary whimsy — he is a character rooted in the city's own nature identity.

Beyond the map, Otto anchors a broader brand ecosystem. The Ottocard transit card concept — featuring Singapore landmark illustrations and the transit line colour strip along the bottom — reimagines the humble travel card as a souvenir. Something a tourist keeps. Something a local feels proud of. This is service design thinking: every touchpoint as an opportunity to strengthen the relationship between commuter and city.

04
Wayfinding Framework

In progress. Field research complete. Proposals in development.

The physical station wayfinding system requires a separate, dedicated design pass — addressing exit hierarchy, orientation anchors at platform level, and consistent visual language across operators. This section will be updated as proposals are developed.

05
Information as Utility: The "Guides" Feature

The Problem: The "Influencer" model often prioritises aesthetic over value, burying useful information under promotional clutter and biased sponsored content.

The Solution: Collaborative Recommendation Engines Glimpse introduces "Guides" — themed, detailed recommendations created by users for their community. By moving from a "post" (temporary) to a "guide" (permanent utility), the platform rewards domain expertise and community value over viral vanity.

Three screenshots of Guides feature: Bangkok guides, location map, and detailed store write-up.
Reflections

What began as a map redesign became something larger — an inquiry into what it means to design public infrastructure for everyone who uses it, not just the majority who have learned to navigate despite its gaps.

The guerrilla signage stays with me. Every laminated A4 sheet is a station staff member solving a problem that design should have solved first. Every confused tourist at an interchange is a person the system quietly failed. These aren't edge cases. They are the real users.

Singapore has built something genuinely world-class. This study is not a critique of that achievement — it is an attempt to push the conversation forward. To ask: now that we've built for efficiency, can we also build for warmth? For inclusivity? For the elderly commuter, the first-time visitor, the child on their first solo journey?

This study stands on the shoulders of those who came before it. Designers like Samuel Lim and enthusiasts like Faiz Basha have contributed meaningfully to the ongoing discourse around Singapore's transit map — their independent studies and passion-driven work have pushed the visual language of our network further than any single official brief could. The teams at LTA, SMRT, SBS Transit, and SMRT Trains are themselves in continuous evolution, and the improvements visible across newer stations like those on the TEL reflect a genuine commitment to getting this right. The Tropical Metro does not position itself against that work — it is part of the same conversation, offered in the same spirit of care for this city and everyone who moves through it.

The Tropical Metro is one answer to that question. An incomplete one. A living one.

More Case Studies
More Case Studies
More Case Studies

Create a free website with Framer, the website builder loved by startups, designers and agencies.